Inspector has ‘serious concerns’ over Cardiff local development plan

February 25, 2010 9 Comments »
View across proposed area of the Waterhall development in the West of Cardiff

View across proposed area of the Waterhall development in the West of Cardiff

Cardiff Council’s Local Development Plan (LDP) has been questioned by the Welsh Assembly Government’s planning inspectors.

At a public meeting in City Hall on Thursday 25th February 2010 with over 130 people in attendance the planning inspectors, Anthony Thickett and Rebecca Phillips, outlined their concerns with the current plan including housing provision, transport links and land designated for employment.

Inspector Thickett gave Cardiff Council three options for moving forward:

1. The council can say the Inspector is wrong, continue with the Local Development Plan as it is and take it to a full hearing in May.

2. The council can produce further evidence to support the current Local Development Plan and show that brownfield sites have enough capacity to meet demand. But how will that provide affordable housing and the right housing mix for Cardiff?

3. The council can accept that some new housing sites will be on greenfield sites. The council would then need to draw up a strategy for whether these are on the West or East of the city and come back with a new Local Development Plan and include provisions for employment and transport.

Rodney Berman, leader of Cardiff Council, said: “I don’t think we’ve got that much further with the inspectors, they are still reiterating that they have major concerns with the plan.

“It would be helpful if the inspectors would go a little bit further and giving us more of a hint about what we should be doing.

“We will need to consider the options presented to us and it’s a decision for the Council to make on March 25th in a vote of full council about how we proceed.”

The Inspectors refused to withdraw the plan and Cardiff Council have not asked for the Inspectors to ask the Assembly to withdrawn the plan. The LDP will now go before a full council meeting on Thursday 25th March 2010 for a decision.

The Inspector’s concerns with the plan are:

Housing

In our view strategy requires too heavily on brownfield and windfall sites. There is no guarantee these windfall sites will appear.

Too many sites are mixed employment and housing, not convinced that the balance is right

Housing mix

There is a big need for family housing but the LDP fails to address that need, there is no policy in place for family housing.

We are concerned about the plans concentrating housing in four parts of the city.

There are too many flats in the city and a lot of the new developments have too much emphasis on flats, and not enough on mixed housing.

Affordable housing

There is a need for 2,173 affordable dwellings to be built per year, according to Assembly guidelines. The current LDP allows for 4,950 affordable dwellings over the course of the entire plan – an average of 306 dwellings per year. This falls short of the expectations of the One Wales agreement.

Only four the current 20 sites are viable for affordable housing provision.

Gypsies & Travellers

194 authorised pitches need to be provided by 2018 according to demand. The current LDP has no provision for Gypsie pitches.

Employment

Four locations identified, Wentloog, Pengham, Leckwith and Green Technology Park. Three of the four have ‘deliverability issues’ and the Environment Agency has concerns over the flood risk on all the sites exclusing Pengham.

Significant reservations that the supply of employment land will not keep up with the projected growth of the city in coming years.

The LDP does not name the existing employment sites that it is wishing to protect.

Cardiff lacks a diversity in employment land and a lack of hi-spec office space and smaller officers for new start-ups.

International Business Park does not consider evidence case provides a justified case for it being near Junction 33 of M4. Not enough evidence that public transport ratio of 70 per cent car, 30 per cent public transport would be met. Concerns over International Business Park sucking businesses away from existing employment centres.

Flood risk

Requirement is to direct new development away from flood risk areas, however LDP sees majority of employment land in Flood Zone C (the highest risk area) and a number of housing developments also in Zone C areas.

Concerned that council did not commission flood-risk strategy until months after the LDP was submitted.

Waste

Concerns over whether LDP makes adequate provision for waste disposal, 20.9 hectares of waste space will be needed. Lamby Way is reaching capacity and LDP does not specify where Cardiff’s waste will go to.

Transport

Absence of a planned approach. Seems to be little link between housing, employment and transport provision. The LDP does not prove what can be provided and there is a failure to specify core transport routes.

What’s your view? Do you think the Local Development Plan adequately reflects the needs of Cardiff? Would you support the building on greenfield sites? Are you part of a campaign group to save a greenfield site?

Related Posts

9 Comments

  1. Peter_D_Cox February 26, 2010 at 9:12 am - Reply

    Cardiff Civic Society set out its objections the LDP in June last year here http://ow.ly/d/1RL. Many of the criticisms of "unsoundness" have been supported by the Inspectors. An updated statement on the Society's views is here http://ow.ly/d/1RO.
    The Council knew what the possible outcomes would be, it is sad for Cardiff that they couldn't have avoided the lengthy delays that will inevitably be involved before Cardiff has an LDP fit for purpose.

  2. tansin March 3, 2010 at 7:24 pm - Reply

    What is right with the Council's development plan? I have lived in old Rumney for many years. Over time it has grown tremendously and not in a good way. It is as though the Councillors want to throw the casts offs of Cardiff to Rumney Ward.

    For many years we have had two Traveller sites which were built on the Rumney green belt ( I say traveller because there are no gypsys in Rumney). The sites in Rumney are the largest in Europe and yet the Council want an additional site–I can guess where!! Why not build one in Lisvane?

  3. tansin March 3, 2010 at 7:27 pm - Reply

    We in Rumney are very close in the vicinity to the Refuse tip on Lamby Way which should have been downsized years ago. Residents have complained endlessly concerning its size and for more control of what is actually dumped..the fact that it has affected the health & well being of those living within the vicinity seems to be of no consequence. We do not want another refuse tip anywhere near the vicinity of Rumney Ward..what about Cardiff North?

  4. tansin March 3, 2010 at 7:38 pm - Reply

    Ceaseless housing development on the greenbelt of Rumney/Trowbridge which is not protected as in other areas of Cardiff. The sheer scale & speed of the HOUSING ASSOCIATION DEVELOPMENT in this area is quite frightening and as such I don't recognise the area. The sheer number of new people moving in have no previous connection/association with the area. This has also caused no end of anti social problems and a serious deficit of open space. Please don't move any more people in and please do not take any more of the litle greemery we have left.

  5. tansin March 7, 2010 at 3:20 pm - Reply

    In the Rumney vicinity we had vast areas of ecology on the wentloog flood planes (the reens) which are supposed to be protected..there is no protection for our area..the locals have campaigned over the years..all to no avail. Still they build more and more businesses. How can this be right?

  6. tansin March 13, 2010 at 4:45 pm - Reply

    Regarding this increased housing need in Cardiff and especially in the east of Cardiff ..I've just read a Westminster article which openly states £750 million given to UK Councils to house asylum seekers, of this figure..Cardiff City Council gained £14.5 million & housing associations and property developers a similar figure–& all for asylum seekers housing..We have no asylum seekers in the UK since these people have crossed so many countries to arrive in the UK. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS GOVERNMENT??

  7. untue May 31, 2012 at 8:27 am - Reply

    Inspector has ‘serious concerns’ over Cardiff local development plan | yourCardiff Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

  8. fjkasakwa May 31, 2012 at 9:12 am - Reply

    Great post at Inspector has ‘serious concerns’ over Cardiff local development plan | yourCardiff. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely useful info specifically the last part :) I care for such information much. I was seeking this certain info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

  9. towing roswell May 31, 2012 at 1:26 pm - Reply

    Howdy are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and set up my own. Do you need any html coding knowledge to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Leave A Response